Samsung's Galaxy Note 7 apology is appreciated, but transparency and details about what went wrong will go farther for the brand.
2016-11-09 08:37:49
alice
12
That transparency will do more to repair Samsung's brand hit than any apology will. Here's what questions I'd like answered:
How did the handoff between the players in the supply chain lead to the Galaxy Note 7 battery issue?
What processes will be changed?
How does Samsung's post mortem apply to the smartphone industry overall?
The actual cause of the battery issue and the role of hardware and software integration?
Where did Samsung controls and management decision making fall short and what's being done to fix those process shortfalls?
Add it up and the investigation into the device and its parts are important. The processes and learning for the rest of the industry will be just as important.
-
?Samsung apologizes to Galaxy Note 7 customers[2016/11/09]
-
The idea of a national ripple effect didn’t seem to much concern Phil Rozenski, policy chair of the American Progressive Bag Alliance.[2016/11/14]
-
It’s Not Just Clean Air: Electric Cars Can Save the US Billions[2016/10/28]
-
BLOG For want of a better battery: Bob McDonald[2016/10/15]
-
Airline ban on Samsung Galaxy Note 7 widens as concern grows about fire risk[2016/10/17]
-
Mopie Powerstation Review: A Smartphone's Secret To All-Day Battery Life[2016/09/26]
-
Should you fear your phone battery?[2016/10/13]
-
iPhone 7 battery charging is so much slower than rivals (but at least it won’t explode)[2016/10/13]
-
St. Jude Warns Defibrillator Patients About Battery Risks[2016/10/12]
-
Samsung Galaxy Note 7 Replacement Still Problematic? Users Complain Over New Battery Issues[2016/09/26]
-
THE BATTERY TECHNOLOGY THAT COULD PUT AN END TO BATTERY FIRES[2016/10/25]
-
A window into battery life for next-gen lithium cells[2016/10/19]