Samsung's Galaxy Note 7 apology is appreciated, but transparency and details about what went wrong will go farther for the brand.
2016-11-09 08:37:49
alice
13
That transparency will do more to repair Samsung's brand hit than any apology will. Here's what questions I'd like answered:
How did the handoff between the players in the supply chain lead to the Galaxy Note 7 battery issue?
What processes will be changed?
How does Samsung's post mortem apply to the smartphone industry overall?
The actual cause of the battery issue and the role of hardware and software integration?
Where did Samsung controls and management decision making fall short and what's being done to fix those process shortfalls?
Add it up and the investigation into the device and its parts are important. The processes and learning for the rest of the industry will be just as important.
-
How Gaza’s plastic factories are betting on recycling[2016/11/03]
-
New Power Report: October issue published[2016/10/27]
-
Toyota’s product plan reportedly includes several small models, including a compact SUV, likely targeting a range greater than 215 miles and built on the Toyota New Global Architecture (TNGA) platform[2016/11/12]
-
Mini unveils its first hybrid vehicle[2016/11/17]
-
Should you fear your phone battery?[2016/10/13]
-
How safe are portable battery packs?[2016/10/21]
-
Bendable Battery May Power Future Wearable Devices, Smartphones[2016/10/19]
-
St. Jude Warns Defibrillator Patients About Battery Risks[2016/10/12]
-
Microsoft remains silent as Surface Pro 3 battery woes pile up[2016/10/08]
-
A window into battery life for next-gen lithium cells[2016/10/19]
-
Airline ban on Samsung Galaxy Note 7 widens as concern grows about fire risk[2016/10/17]
-
Battery power unviable alternative to traditional energy sources[2016/10/25]
-
How Scientists Turned Junkyard Scrap Metal Into A Battery[2016/11/08]
-
Samsung Galaxy Note 7 Replacement Still Problematic? Users Complain Over New Battery Issues[2016/09/26]